Did we really go to the Moon?
We are not saying that man didn’t go to the moon. We are simply asking some interesting questions based on some peculiar observations.
One peculiarity is the state of the lunar surface beneath the Lunar Module (LEM). The LEM, which allegedly carried astronauts to the moon, utilized a descent engine producing approximately 10,000 pounds of thrust. Given such immense power, one would reasonably expect to see a significant disturbance beneath the module—scorched dust, a crater-like depression, or at the very least, displaced lunar soil. Yet, the photographs and videos provided by NASA show an undisturbed surface, as if the LEM had been gently placed rather than having undergone a controlled descent. Compounding the controversy, renowned geologists and physicists have pointed out that the fine regolith, or lunar dust, should have been forcefully displaced by the engine’s powerful blast. Instead, it appears to remain settled, with the lander’s footpads resting on an unmarked surface. How could such an intense descent leave no visible evidence of its own arrival? See image below.
Did Google AI deepfake detector analyze Apollo moon landing images and conclude they were fake?
Why Haven’t We Returned?
NASA successfully landed humans on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972. But after Apollo 17, no human has set foot there again. Why? The official reason is funding and shifting priorities, but that seems odd considering the technological leaps since then.
- Why hasn’t any other country replicated the feat, despite advancements in technology?
- Why did NASA recently claim they are still trying to figure out how to get past the Van Allen radiation belts, when they supposedly did it in 1969?
Buzz Aldrin’s Strange Statements
Buzz Aldrin has made several eyebrow-raising comments. In a well-known interview with a young girl, when asked why we never returned to the moon, Buzz responded: “because, we didn’t go there – and that’s the way it happened.”
Fun Fact: Buzz’s mother’s maiden name was Moon … Marion Moon Aldrin
The Oddities in Moon Photos
Many moon photos from Apollo missions show multiple light sources, despite the claim that the Sun is the only illumination.
- Why do shadows cast at different angles when there should be only one light source?
- Why do some objects appear lit from the front despite being in shadow?
- Why do some footprints look too sharp, as if made in a damp surface rather than dry lunar dust?
Where Are the Stars?
The Apollo moon landings provided thousands of photographs—yet not one captures the breathtaking star-filled sky astronauts should have seen.
The sky on the Moon is filled with stars—brighter and more numerous than we ever see on Earth, since there’s no atmosphere to scatter light. With no air or light pollution, even faint stars should have been incredibly vivid against the blackness of space. A mind-blowing spectacle.
NASA claims camera settings favored the bright lunar surface, making stars too faint to appear. But why not take separate shots? Astronauts had time for golf and playful jumps—surely a quick upward snap of the sky was possible. Even the International Space Station captures stars, so why does Apollo’s footage remain devoid of them?
Was this a simple oversight—or something more?
Missing or Destroyed Evidence
NASA admits they “lost” the original Apollo 11 telemetry data—arguably the most important records of mankind’s greatest achievement.
- Why would they erase or lose such data?
- Why is there no verifiable independent footage of the landings from Earth-based telescopes?
The Radiation Problem
- The Van Allen radiation belts pose a massive challenge for human space travel. How did astronauts pass through them unharmed with 1960s technology?
- NASA currently warns about radiation hazards for future moon missions—so how did Apollo astronauts survive with thin aluminum shielding?
Technology Regression?
We had the technology to go to the moon in 1969, but today, NASA says it’s still figuring out how to do it again.
- Why did we go from landing on the moon to struggling with basic manned spaceflight for decades?
- Why do modern space missions—despite vastly superior technology—focus on low Earth orbit instead of returning?
The Fake “Moon Rock”
A so-called “moon rock” had been gifted by the United States to the Dutch government in 1969, presented to former Prime Minister Willem Drees as a token of goodwill. Decades later, when the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam decided to test the rock using modern geological methods, the shocking truth emerged—it was nothing more than a piece of petrified wood. Scientists from the Free University of Amsterdam conducted detailed spectroscopic and mineralogical analyses, confirming that the rock was not from the moon.
If the moon landings were a hoax, it wouldn’t have required a massive conspiracy—just a handful of key figures “in the know.” The astronauts themselves were orbiting Earth while pre-recorded footage of “moon landings” played to the world. The public, the mission control staff, and even most of NASA could have been convinced they were witnessing a genuine moon landing. Given the Cold War stakes, the motivation to stage such an event would have been immense. The question remains: did we truly land on the moon, or were we all watching the most convincing illusion in history?
Things that make you go Hmmmmm????
The crazy thing for me was the press conference the astronauts gave after returning to earth. They looked like they were at a funeral. Not at all the disposition that one would have after having accomplished one of the most amazing feats in all of human history. That to me is a major tell.
I was born and raised in the “Space Coast” of Florida. I’ve grown up watching launches all my life. Now I work with the Artemis program. But nothing can make me believe in the moon landing. My father also worked very closely with Artemis 1, specifically Orion. He has dedicated hundreds of hours inside of that capsule. He also hand painted the American flag on the outside of the capsule panels! He worked very hard on the project as a whole and I believe it wouldn’t have launched at the time without his efforts. That being said, you couldn’t PAY this man to believe we went to the moon! The technology and planning with the program is a complete joke. I’m surprised Joe didn’t know in this video that we were actively trying to get “back” to the moon. Right now, I’m working with Artemis 2, which is a $hit show. It’s not sustainable at all. I believe that this program will be in the can, as it’s being threatened right now, and they will slap a NASA meatball logo on a SpaceX starship in order to maintain a stronghold position in space exploration.