May 29, 2025

Apple, a titan in the tech world, celebrated for its Apple Watch, is now entangled in a class-action lawsuit that claims some of its watch bands contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), infamously known as “forever chemicals.” Filed in January 2025 in a California federal court, the suit targets Apple’s Sport Band, Ocean Band, and Nike Sport Band, alleging these products harbor toxic PFAS linked to serious health risks like cancer, infertility, and immune system issues. The case raises questions about consumer safety, corporate accountability, and the widespread use of PFAS in everyday products.

The lawsuit accuses Apple of deceptive marketing, claiming the company touted its watch bands as safe and eco-friendly while concealing the presence of PFAS. These synthetic chemicals, prized for their water and stain resistant properties, persist in the environment and human body, earning their “forever chemicals” moniker.

The allegations stem from a December 2024 University of Notre Dame study that tested 22 smartwatch bands and found elevated PFAS levels in 15 of them, with significant concentrations of perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA). While the study didn’t explicitly name Apple, the lawsuit points to it as evidence that Apple’s fluoroelastomer-based bands—chosen for their durability and flexibility—contain these hazardous substances.

The plaintiffs argue that PFAS in the bands can be absorbed through the skin, particularly during exercise when sweat increases contact. This is especially concerning for Apple Watch users who wear the device for fitness tracking. The lawsuit alleges fraud, unjust enrichment, and violations of California consumer protection laws, seeking to represent U.S. customers who purchased the affected bands.

Apple’s Defense: Safety Testing and PFAS Phase-Out

Apple has pushed back, asserting that its watch bands are safe and rigorously tested. The company confirms using fluoroelastomer in some bands but insists the material meets health and safety standards. Since 2022, Apple has pledged to eliminate PFAS from its products, acknowledging the challenge of finding alternatives that maintain the bands’ performance. “We are committed to protecting our customers and the environment,” an Apple spokesperson said, emphasizing ongoing efforts to phase out PFAS.

The Notre Dame study didn’t single out Apple and PFAS are common across many industries, from textiles to electronics. This raises the question of whether Apple is being unfairly targeted due. Still, the company’s eco-friendly branding makes the allegations particularly damaging, as consumers expect transparency from a brand synonymous with health and innovation.

The Broader Issue: PFAS Everywhere!

The Apple Watch controversy shines a light on a larger problem: PFAS are pervasive in consumer goods. The Notre Dame study suggests that smartwatch bands from multiple brands may contain these chemicals, indicating an industry-wide challenge. While the health risks of PFAS exposure through skin contact are not fully understood, their links to serious conditions are well-documented, fueling public concern.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. For details on the lawsuit, refer to California federal court filings or Apple’s official statements. Consult a health professional for concerns about PFAS exposure.