Did a Projectile / Bullet Hit Charlie Kirk from Below?
This gripping compilation features two distinct video clips captured by attendees’ phones during the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. The first clip, recorded from a low vantage point in the crowd, shows a bullet striking Kirk in the neck from a sharp upward angle, suggesting the shooter (or device) was positioned below or at a significant incline relative to the stage. The second clip, filmed from a different perspective, captures the moment of impact with a clear view of the projectile’s exit wound, highlighting the bullet’s trajectory as it passes through Kirk’s neck. This also explains the shirt movements. We are not saying there was a mystery gunman; we are simply saying: ‘Hey, look at this interesting video footage.’
The Video showing a projectile fired from under Charlie Kirk – at a very sharp upward angle.
Viewer discretion is advised due to the graphic nature of the content.
When aligned, these extreme bullet angles match pretty closely. They were recorded independently from different phones, and provide chilling clues. The footage reveals the precision and angle of the single shot. Was it fired from a device located in front of or under Kirk?
According to Andrew Kolvet, spokesman for Turning Point USA, the surgeon at the hospital expressed shock that the bullet did not exit Kirk’s body. Kolvet described the bullet as being found “just beneath the skin”.
The coroner reportedly recovered the bullet during postmortem examination, but no name has been released for that individual. No attending physician has been publicly identified, and no autopsy report has been released.
It is worth noting that the exact location at UVU where Charlie was shot was ripped up the next day and replaced with concrete blocks for some odd reason. Also, there seems to be hatch and UVU has confirmed “tunnels” under the area where Kirk was shot.
The rapid renovation of the Utah Valley University (UVU) courtyard, where Charlie Kirk was shot raises questions given the ongoing nature of the investigation and limited public disclosure. Typically, altering a crime scene is a legal and procedural concern, as it can compromise evidence collection and integrity, potentially leading to legal challenges.
According to Grok: UVU blueprints (publicly available via their facilities site) confirm utility tunnels and hatches under the amphitheater for maintenance, tying into HVAC, plumbing, and even emergency egress.
I still have still not heard or been able to find if they actually found the projectile that hit Charlie Kirk?
I have extensively hunted with, shot and reloaded for a large part of my life with a 30/06 bolt action rifle. I know a lot about bullets, ballistics, sectional density, etc. I have seen how the projectiles perform when they hit flesh, bone or both. Does anyone know if they have the projectile? Also information on the projectile. (Weight , jacket, diameter, brand)
All critical information to solving the case.
Jay, According to Andrew Kolvet, spokesman for Turning Point USA, the surgeon at the hospital expressed shock that the bullet did not exit Kirk’s body. Kolvet described the bullet as being found “just beneath the skin”.
The coroner reportedly recovered the bullet during postmortem examination, but no name has been released for that individual. No attending physician has been publicly identified, and no autopsy report has been released.
This smells fishy. Why the renovation? WTF! There it is as plain as day – REAL QUESTIONS!!
The Magic Mauser theory. “IT” somehow got up on that building by itself and un-noticed. It then fired its “Magic 30.06 Bullet” that hit Charlie in the neck but because of Charlie’s “Magic Man of Steel” neck vertebrae, it was miraculously stopped with no exit wound. He was taken to the hospital that Magically has nobody documenting anything about Charlie’s arrival or treatment and these were all nobodies with no names. He was then released to the “Secret Medical Examiner”, also with no name. Isn’t that pretty much IT?